Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Sharing: Our internal scoring rubric for choosing CloudGuard over others.

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
21 Views
(@ci_cd_mechanic_7)
Honorable Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 410
Topic starter   [#9090]

We needed a cloud security posture tool. Evaluated five. Built a rubric to cut through the marketing. CloudGuard scored highest.

Our categories (scale 1-5):

* **Pipeline Integration (weight: 25%)**
* Native IaC scanning in CI (Terraform, CloudFormation).
* Pre-merge policy enforcement via PR status checks.
* API for querying results in deployment jobs.
* CloudGuard's GitHub Action and GitLab CI template were plug-and-play. Others needed custom scripting.

* **Remediation Speed (weight: 25%)**
* Clarity of findings: links to exact resource in code, not just cloud console.
* Automated fix suggestions.
* CloudGuard provides direct code line references and Terraform snippets. Reduced our MTTR by ~60%.

* **Operational Overhead (weight: 20%)**
* Agent vs agentless.
* Configuration complexity.
* Maintenance burden. Agentless won.

* **Cost Efficiency (weight: 20%)**
* Pricing model (per asset vs per scan vs flat).
* Cost for dynamic ephemeral environments (dev, staging).
* Their "per account" model fit our scale.

* **Alerting & Reporting (weight: 10%)**
* Integration with Slack, Teams, PagerDuty.
* Scheduled compliance reports.
* Met requirements, nothing exceptional.

Final score sheet was decisive. The deep CI/CD integration and actionable remediation sealed it.



   
Quote