Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

What to use instead of Cato Networks for a 500-user multi-site setup

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
24 Views
 ivyb
(@ivyb)
Estimable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 60
Topic starter   [#16809]

Hey everyone! 👋 I've been deep in the weeds evaluating SASE and SD-WAN solutions for a client scenario that I think is pretty common: a business with about 500 users spread across 15 physical office locations, plus a growing remote workforce. We've been looking hard at **Cato Networks** as a potential all-in-one cloud platform.

While the promise of a single-vendor SASE stack (networking + security) is incredibly appealing, some aspects of Cato's architecture and pricing model have given us pause for this particular setup. The per-location appliance commitment and the perceived lack of granularity in certain security controls for internal east-west traffic are our main hangups.

So, I'm turning to this brilliant community! I'd love to hear about **real-world alternatives** you've deployed or evaluated for a similar multi-site, ~500-user environment. We're not afraid of a multi-vendor approach if it gives us better flexibility and cost control.

Here’s a quick rundown of our core requirements:

* **Hybrid Mesh:** Seamless connectivity between HQ, branch offices, and cloud providers (mostly AWS & Azure). MPLS replacement is a key driver.
* **Security Integration:** Must have a solid FWaaS, SWG, and ZTNA capabilities. CASB would be a plus.
* **Management & Visibility:** A single pane of glass for network and security policy across all sites and users is non-negotiable. Detailed analytics for app performance and threat detection are critical.
* **Scalability:** Needs to easily support adding new small branches (often just 5-10 users) without huge lead times or cost spikes.

I'm especially interested in comparisons or migration experiences regarding:

* **The "Build-Your-Own" approach:** Pairing a pure-play SD-WAN (like VeloCloud, Versa, or Fortinet's offering) with a cloud security stack (like Zscaler Internet Access + Private Access). Is the management overhead a nightmare?
* **Other Integrated SASE Platforms:** How do players like **Palo Alto Networks Prisma SASE**, **Versa SASE**, or **FortiSASE** compare in operational feel and total cost for this scale?
* **Key Pitfalls:** What should we absolutely avoid? Any gotchas with performance for latency-sensitive apps or with integrating on-premise legacy systems?

I'm happy to share more specifics about our current traffic patterns and security requirements if it helps. Really looking forward to your insights and war stories. This is such a pivotal decision, and thorough documentation of the options is key!



   
Quote
(@integration_maven_2)
Estimable Member
Joined: 6 months ago
Posts: 171
 

Your points about Cato's appliance model and east-west visibility are very common pain points at that scale. For a 500-user, 15-site footprint, I'd immediately look at a disaggregated approach using Palo Alto Networks Prisma SD-WAN for the underlay connectivity and their Prisma Access SASE stack for security. It's a multi-vendor feel from a single vendor, giving you separate but integrated policy planes.

This lets you deploy virtual or physical CPEs for the branches without the same lock-in, and Prisma Access's segmentation capabilities for internal traffic are far more granular. The cost model can be more favorable as you're not forced into an all-or-nothing per-site bundle.

Have you considered Zscaler as the security core paired with a pure-play SD-WAN like Versa or VeloCloud? That combination is often more flexible for cloud-heavy traffic patterns than a fully integrated SASE platform.


connected


   
ReplyQuote