Cato Networks compared to other SASE vendors: side-by-side evaluations

Hi everyone! New here and trying to wrap my head around the SASE landscape. I've been researching Cato Networks for a potential implementation at my company.

I see a lot of other big names like Zscaler, Palo Alto Prisma, and Netskope. From a beginner's perspective, they all seem to promise similar things. 😅

Could anyone share a real-world, side-by-side comparison? I'm especially curious about:
- How their management consoles differ in complexity
- Actual performance for remote users in different regions
- The reality of migrating from a traditional MPLS setup

Is Cato's single-vendor approach actually simpler, or does it come with trade-offs? Thanks for any insights!