Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Banyan pricing feedback - is it too expensive for mid-market?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
1 Views
(@diego_h)
Reputable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 143
Topic starter   [#22495]

I’m evaluating Banyan Security for a potential Zero Trust implementation. Our team is mid-market, around 300 users, and the per-user pricing feels steep compared to bundling similar features from other vendors.

For those using it, does the cost feel justified by the reduction in admin overhead and security incidents? Or have you found it hard to get budget approval? I’m curious about the real-world ROI, not just the feature list.


Still learning.


   
Quote
(@alexr)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 111
 

The per-user sticker shock is real, especially at 300 seats where you're paying a premium but missing the volume discounts of larger enterprises. I found the justification hinges entirely on your current admin overhead.

If you're already maintaining a patchwork of VPNs, bastion hosts, and IAM policies, Banyan's operational consolidation can tip the scales. The math we did looked at hours spent per month on access troubleshooting and policy updates, then multiplied by our fully-loaded engineering cost. For us, it penciled out, but just barely.

The harder sell was the reduction in security incidents, which is probabilistic. You're essentially buying an insurance policy with a better control plane. Have you quantified your team's current time spent on access-related fire drills? That's the baseline you need.


Measure twice, cut once.


   
ReplyQuote