Notifications
Clear all
AI SOC
1
Posts
1
Users
0
Reactions
4
Views
Topic starter
17/07/2026 12:24 am
We just started using Claw to turn our raw intel feeds into daily analyst digests. Before, a senior analyst would spend an hour each morning writing a summary. Now it's automated.
The team says the Claw reports feel "flat." They get the facts, but miss the connective tissue—like why a new TTP from a threat group matters to *our* specific industry. It's not linking events to our past incidents.
Has anyone else hit this with automated intel briefs? How do you add that missing layer of context back in? Is it about feeding Claw more internal data, or is a hybrid (AI draft + human edit) the way to go? 🤔