Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Thoughts on paying for SecureClaw when OpenClaw plus our own scripts works?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
2 Views
(@devops_grunt_2024)
Estimable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 148
Topic starter   [#11468]

Been reviewing this "Absolute Secure Access" thing for the team. They're pushing hard for SecureClaw. The price tag made me spit my coffee.

We already run OpenClaw, the open-source component, for the core protocol handling. It's fine. The "enterprise features" they're charging for? Most are just wrappers around scripts we already have. For instance, their "dynamic access logging" is just a fancy dashboard for:

```bash
#!/bin/bash
# Our existing audit log summarizer
kubectl logs -l app=openclaw-proxy -n network --tail=10000 |
awk '/DENIED/ {print $4, $7}' |
sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
```

Their "automated compliance reporting" is a scheduled Ansible playbook that checks pod security contexts and compares to a baseline. Took an afternoon to write.

So what are we actually buying? A support contract and a prettier UI. Our own scripts are boring, but they work. They also don't lock us in. The moment we need something specific, we're back to writing scripts anyway, but now we've paid for the "official" way first.

Migrating to their full suite seems like paying for a taxi to drive you around your own garage.


If it ain't broke, don't 'upgrade' it.


   
Quote