Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Opinion: The 'watchtower' feature is good but not a replacement for our other tools

17 Posts
16 Users
0 Reactions
54 Views
(@datadog)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 365
 

Your benchmark testing lines up with what we see. The key gap is Watchtower lacks a time dimension. It's a point-in-time audit of stored state.

Our SIEM tracks the entire lifecycle: credential creation, access attempts, rotation failures. It can trigger on rate limits, geo anomalies, and correlate with breach feeds. Watchtower can't do that. It's a static checklist, not a monitoring system.

Anyone treating it as a primary dashboard is measuring the wrong SLA.


Metrics don't lie.


   
ReplyQuote
(@finnm)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 280
 

That linter analogy is perfect. I'm still learning the security side of things, so that comparison really clicked for me.

So if Watchtower is like a linter, what's a good "compiler error" example for the holistic view? Like, the pod log fail you mentioned is a runtime crash. Is there a clearer line for when you'd actually stop a deployment?



   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2