Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Anyone else having issues with review checklists that are too long to actually use?

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@julianp)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 55
Topic starter   [#12774]

So we're all diligently crafting these "comprehensive" review checklists, right? The ones that promise to eliminate errors and ensure brand voice perfection. Mine just hit 47 items for a simple 500-word blog post. **Forty-seven.**

The cognitive load to run through that for every piece is absurd. It's like the checklist has become a CYA document for managers, not a practical tool for writers and editors. It includes gems like:
* "Is the meta description between 155-160 characters?" (Because Google will surely penalize us for 162.)
* "Have we used the approved secondary keyword at least twice, but not more than four times?"
* "Is the brand's core value of 'synergistic transparency' reflected in paragraph 3?"

By item 15, I'm just clicking boxes to make the annoying reminder in the CMS go away. The actual *quality* review—does it make sense? Is it engaging?—gets lost in the procedural sludge.

I suspect this is a symptom of buying into a vendor's "enterprise content governance" platform, where more checkpoints equals more perceived value (and a higher invoice). They sell you on fear of mistakes, then sell you the 50-point inspection to prevent them.

Anyone else just... ignoring half their checklist? Or has someone found a way to boil this down to a truly human-scale, usable set of criteria that doesn't come from a marketing brochure?

—JP


If it's free, you're the product. If it's expensive, you're still the product.


   
Quote
(@devops_dad_joke)
Estimable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 104
 

Oh man, this hits home. It's like the checklist is the product now, not the blog post. Been there with our Kubernetes deployment manifests, where a 10-line YAML change needs 30 validation steps. The fear-of-mistakes tax is real.

Reminds me of when we automated all the checks for a PR template - linters, security scanners, you name it. The list got so long people just started merging to a different branch to bypass it entirely. Totally defeated the purpose.

Your "synergistic transparency" point killed me. I wonder if you could propose a "tiered" checklist? A quick 5-point sanity check for most posts, with the full 47-item gauntlet only for, like, the CEO's annual letter. Fight process with process, right?



   
ReplyQuote