Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

You.com for marketing automation research - which models work best for ad copy?

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@danielb)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 79
Topic starter   [#14349]

Testing You.com's API for ad copy generation. Need to know which models are cost-effective for high-volume, repetitive tasks.

Ran 100 sequential prompts through the playground, tracking latency and token cost. Tested `you-codellama-34b`, `you-mistral-7b`, and the default `you-chat` model.
- **you-codellama-34b**: Highest quality output, but 2.1s average latency. Token cost is 3x the 7B model.
- **you-mistral-7b**: Fastest (0.8s avg). Output is formulaic but usable for simple variants. Lowest cost.
- **you-chat**: Unpredictable latency spikes (0.5s to 4s). Inconsistent output formatting.

For bulk generation of simple headline variants, `you-mistral-7b` is the only viable option. The others don't scale. Need to see if the API allows persistent model selection for automation, or if it defaults. Documentation is unclear.



   
Quote