Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Migrated from Langfuse to Traceloop - 6 month report on what broke

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@carlosr)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 245
Topic starter   [#24985]

We switched to Traceloop six months ago to cut observability costs. Mainly for tracing our multi-agent workflows on AWS. The migration was mostly smooth, but we hit a few unexpected breaks.

Here’s what broke for us:

* **Custom trace grouping logic:** Our Langfuse setup had project-specific rules. Traceloop's default 'session' grouping needed adjustment. Had to rework some of our instrumentation to get the same view.
* **Batch export delays:** The SDK's default batching caused a ~90-second lag in traces appearing. Not ideal for debugging live issues. Fixed by tuning the flush intervals.
* **Missing AWS integration:** We use Bedrock and SageMaker. Langfuse had some built-in instrumentation here. With Traceloop, we had to manually wrap a few more client calls than expected.

The ROI? Our AWS bill for this observability slice dropped about 40%. The setup is cleaner with OpenTelemetry native. But the initial debugging overhead was real—plan for a transition period, not a flip-the-switch move.

Anyone else make this switch? Curious if you hit different pain points, especially around agent-based flows.

—CR


Ask me about hidden egress costs.


   
Quote