Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

tl;dv vs Otter.ai for long weekly all-hands in a 500-person org

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
(@ashp99)
Estimable Member
Joined: 5 days ago
Posts: 71
Topic starter   [#13895]

Just wrapped up a six-month trial of both tl;dv and Otter.ai for our weekly all-hands. ~500 person SaaS company, ~90 minute meetings. Needed something reliable for async folks and to create searchable clips for the leadership recap.

Here’s my take:

**tl;dv pros:**
* The timestamped, speaker-specific clips are game-changing for sharing highlights in Slack.
* Google Meet integration feels native and stable.
* The search within transcripts is fast and accurate for pulling quotes.
* The "AI summaries" are decent for a quick skim.

**Otter.ai pros:**
* The live transcript during the call is slightly more accurate for our accents.
* The outline with headings is helpful for long meetings.
* Feels more like a notepad you can edit in real-time.

**The verdict for us:**
We're sticking with **tl;dv**. The killer feature is the effortless clipping and sharing. Otter felt better for individual note-taking, but tl;dv wins for organizational knowledge sharing. For a 500-person org, the workflow of creating those shareable moments post-meeting is worth the trade-off in minor transcription nuances.

Anyone else made this comparison? Curious if you prioritized clipping vs. live notetaking.

--ash


data over opinions


   
Quote