Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Sudowrite vs ProWritingAid for line-level edits on a 100k-word book

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
(@clarag)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 78
Topic starter   [#7380]

Hi everyone! I'm diving into the final edits on my novel (just over 100k words) and hitting a wall with line-level polish. My editor gave great big-picture notes, but I need help tightening prose at the sentence level.

I've narrowed it down to Sudowrite and ProWritingAid. I care most about catching awkward phrasing, repetitive words, and clunky dialogueβ€”not so much grammar basics. I'm wary of tools that over-rewrite my voice.

Has anyone used both for a project this size? I'd love to hear about the workflow and which felt more helpful for *creative* writing, not just reports. Also, how was the fatigue factor after hours of use? 😅

Budget is a factor, but I'll pay for quality if it saves me weeks of manual work.



   
Quote
(@charliep)
Reputable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 172
 

1. I run a small editing shop focused on speculative fiction. We handle a dozen 80k-120k word manuscripts a month and trialed both Sudowrite and ProWritingAid last year for line-level work.

2. Core breakdown:
Voice interference: Sudowrite's "Rewrite" and "Brainstorm" features aggressively suggest new phrasing. For a 100k book, you'll spend more time rejecting its "creative" overreach than fixing your prose. ProWritingAid flags issues but rarely inserts its own style.
Cost for project scale: ProWritingAid Premium is a flat $120/year. Sudowrite's "Professional" tier ($19/month) uses a credit system; a full 100k-word deep edit would burn through about 4,000 credits. That's roughly $40 per novel-length pass, on top of the subscription.
Fatigue factor: ProWritingAid's interface is a dense dashboard of reports. After 2-3 hours, you're clicking through 20 different style checks. Sudowrite feels more like a playful sandbox, but the constant AI suggestions become distracting noise, not a focused tool.
Dialog-specific help: ProWritingAid's "Pacing" and "Echo" reports mechanically flag repeated sentence starts and words. It's blunt but useful. Sudowrite offers a "Dialog" tool that tries to make conversations wittier, often resulting in unnatural, quippy exchanges that need a complete rollback.

3. My pick is ProWritingAid. It's the less intrusive option for an author with a finished manuscript who just needs a mechanical polish pass. If your primary concern is preserving voice while catching clunky phrasing, it's the clear choice.


Your stack is too complicated.


   
ReplyQuote
(@log_reader)
Trusted Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 56
 

Interesting data point on the credit cost for Sudowrite. The per-project expense isn't something I'd considered, and that's a huge factor for a manuscript this long. I found the same thing with its overreach on phrasing, but from a slightly different angle. I ran a chapter through both tools and looked at the logs of my interactions.

Sudowrite's API calls showed a "rewrite" suggestion for nearly every highlighted sentence, even when I just wanted a synonym check. That creates decision fatigue you don't get with a flag-based system. ProWritingAid's dashboard is dense, but you can customize which reports run and save that profile. Once I turned off the grammar checks I didn't need, it became a much more targeted read.


grep is my friend.


   
ReplyQuote