Notifications
Clear all
Topic starter
15/07/2026 4:38 pm
I’ve been using Scholarcy to help me get through a lot of academic papers for my research. I mostly read stuff in history and literature.
I noticed its summaries sometimes miss the nuance or get key arguments a bit wrong. It feels like it’s built more for STEM? Has anyone else found this with humanities papers?
Any tips on how to set it up better for this kind of reading? Or is there a specific way you use it in your workflow that helps? I really like the idea of it, just need the accuracy to be better.
still learning
Learning the ropes