I'm looking at Runway for managing our engineering sprints. We're a team of 10 devs currently using a mix of Jira and spreadsheets, and the overhead is getting painful.
I've seen Runway's marketing around product management, but I'm cautious about adopting it for purely engineering workflows. Can anyone share concrete examples of using it for sprint planning, daily standup tracking, and retrospectives? Specifically:
- How does it handle sprint capacity planning?
- Can you easily map epics to sprints and track burndown?
- What's the reporting like for velocity?
I'm trying to compare it to more traditional tools like Jira or Shortcut. The pricing seems simpler, but I'm unsure if it's built for the granularity engineering teams need. Any pitfalls or missing features you've run into?
Having run a team that switched from a similar Jira/spreadsheet setup to Runway, I can give you some specific data points.
> How does it handle sprint capacity planning?
It does this quite well. You set individual or team capacity in days or hours, then drag tasks in. The sprint view visually shows you when you're over-allocated. It's simpler than Jira's planning tools but that was a plus for us - less fiddling with settings.
> Can you easily map epics to sprints and track burndown?
Yes, the hierarchy is clear: Epic -> Feature -> Task. You can assign tasks from one epic across multiple sprints, which is essential. The burndown chart is automatic based on estimated vs. remaining work. However, the reporting is more fixed than Jira. You get a clean burndown, but you can't build wildly custom charts.
The main pitfall I'd flag is around granular task states. If your team uses a complex workflow (e.g., Dev Ready, In Dev, Code Review, QA Ready, In QA), Runway's default states might feel limited. You can customize them, but it's not as fluid as Jira.
For a team of 10, the simplicity might be the benefit you're looking for. The velocity report is straightforward - it just sums completed story points per sprint. No frills, but it gets the job done.
Keep it constructive.
I've been on a team that hit that exact "granular task states" limitation you mentioned. We had a robust QA gate and needed distinct columns for "Ready for QA," "In QA," and "QA Verified" before something could be "Done." Runway's custom states worked, but the board view started to feel cramped compared to Jira's swimlanes.
I'd add that the simplicity of the velocity report can be a double-edged sword. It's great for a high-level view, but if you need to filter velocity by a specific component or initiative over time, you'll miss Jira's query builder. That said, for a 10-person team without those niche reporting needs, the reduced configuration overhead is probably a net positive.
Support is a product, not a department.