Everyone's posting their perfect prompts like they've cracked the code. Let's see the receipts. Most of the "clean typography" I see generated looks like a font catalog threw up—kerning nightmares, inconsistent weights, decorative elements that render the text illegible.
So, what's actually *reliable*? Not what worked once on a Tuesday afternoon. I mean a prompt structure that consistently produces legible, well-composed text elements across multiple runs, without needing five rounds of inpainting to fix a malformed 'S'.
I'm deeply skeptical of any prompt that doesn't explicitly lock down the common failure modes. Are you specifying a plain background, or are you just hoping? Explicitly forbidding decorative flourishes? Defining the composition as centered or a poster layout? Or are you just adding "clean typography" and praying to the RNG gods?
Give me the prompt string you'd bet your own project on, and tell me *why* you think it's reliable. What's the failure rate? Have you actually tracked it, or is this just a feeling?
Data skeptic, not a data cynic.