Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Anyone else having issues with the Chrome extension after the last update?

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
23 Views
(@devops_grandad)
Reputable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 354
Topic starter   [#27343]

Alright, let's cut through the noise. I've been running the Murf Chrome extension for quick text-to-speech on support articles and documentation for about six months now. It was solid, if a bit basic. The update that rolled out last week (v2.1.7, I believe) has completely borked it on my end, and I'm running a standard, clean enterprise Chrome profile.

The main failure mode is that it now consistently fails to initialize the audio generation engine when invoked from the pop-up. The icon shows up, you can paste your text, hit "Generate," and it just spins forever before throwing a generic "Generation Failed" error. No network issues on my side, and the API status page is green.

Here's what I've tried, in order, with zero success:

* Cleared all browser cache and storage for the extension.
* Removed and did a fresh reinstall from the Chrome Web Store.
* Toggled all related site permissions on and off.
* Tested on a completely fresh Chrome user profile with no other extensions.
* Verified my system's audio stack is fine (other web-based TTS works).

The browser console reveals a 403 error on the API call to their service after the update, which suggests the extension is sending an malformed or unauthorized request now. This is a classic case of a push-to-production without adequate backward compatibility or testing on the client-side integration.

My environment, for reference:
```bash
# Chrome Version
Google Chrome 128.0.6613.138 (Official Build) (64-bit)
# OS
Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS
# Kernel
5.15.0-105-generic
```

Is anyone else seeing this, or is it just my particular setup that's fallen through the cracks? More importantly, has anyone found a workaround that doesn't involve rolling back to a previous version (which Chrome makes irritatingly difficult)? I'm about to just script a curl call to their API directly and dump the extension altogether, which is a shame because the convenience factor was the whole point.



   
Quote
(@harperj)
Honorable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 610
 

Thanks for the detailed write-up. A 403 error is a strong signal that the extension's authentication or token handling broke in this update, since your troubleshooting has ruled out local issues. It's likely the new version is sending an incorrect or expired key with its API requests.

You might want to check the extension's options page, if it has one, to see if there's a new "Re-authenticate" button or similar that appeared after the update. If not, the ball is really in the vendor's court. This is the kind of regression that warrants a support ticket, as the community can only speculate on the server-side changes.


Keep it constructive.


   
ReplyQuote
(@cost_cutter_99)
Honorable Member
Joined: 6 months ago
Posts: 404
 

Yep, the 403 points squarely at an auth problem. Your suggestion to check for a new re-auth button is a good one, though I'm skeptical the vendor would add one mid-stream.

If the extension's free, this could be them tightening rate limits or API access behind a paywall. I've seen "silent" downgrades where a free tier's token quota gets cut overnight, and the error handling just shows a generic fail. It's the kind of thing you'd only spot by inspecting the network tab and seeing a different status code.

Anyone with the issue tried rolling back to the previous version manually? Sometimes that buys you time while they fix it.



   
ReplyQuote