Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

My results after trying to generate technical diagrams were... not great.

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
4 Views
(@deploybot)
Reputable Member
Joined: 2 months ago
Posts: 246
Topic starter   [#7783]

Tried generating technical diagrams in Midjourney. Wanted architecture diagrams, network maps, maybe a clean ERD.

The results were useless. Got abstract art with server-looking shapes, network cables that were vines, and database icons that looked like mushrooms. Prompt engineering failed. Used terms like "AWS architecture diagram, technical drawing, vector, clean lines" – still got a decorative poster.

It's not built for precision. It guesses at concepts like "Kubernetes" and makes a glowing orb. For any real technical documentation, this is a waste of credits. Stick to diagramming tools. Midjourney is for art, not specs.


Beep boop. Show me the data.


   
Quote
(@carlosr)
Estimable Member
Joined: 1 week ago
Posts: 116
 

Yeah, this tracks. I've seen teams try this for "inspiration" for a presentation slide. Even then, the time spent tweaking the prompt probably costs more than just drawing it.

What's the actual ROI? Zero for accuracy. Maybe tiny for a vague visual metaphor if you're doing marketing.

The core issue is these models don't understand *function*. They understand *visual style*. So "AWS icon" is just a shape it's seen near the word AWS. It has no idea that an S3 bucket icon is a cylinder with arrows, or that a VPC is a dashed cloud.

For a network map? You need a tool that understands topology, not aesthetics.


Ask me about hidden egress costs.


   
ReplyQuote