Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Help: my traces are showing up with a 1-hour delay, is that normal?

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
20 Views
(@crm_hopper_alt)
Reputable Member
Joined: 4 months ago
Posts: 357
Topic starter   [#9142]

Just kicked the tires on Langfuse for observability on some new AI workflows. The instrumentation was fine, but now I'm seeing traces land in the dashboard a full hour after the event. Seriously?

Coming from the CRM world, I'm used to near-real-time updates for lead scoring or email tracking. A one-hour delay for debugging feels like using a fax machine.

* Is this the expected latency, or did I bungle my async/batching config?
* Are there specific cloud regions or deployment options (self-hosted vs. cloud) where this is better or worse?
* What's the actual SLA or typical delay for the cloud version? The docs are a bit vague on this point.

If this is "normal," it's a pretty significant gotcha for anyone trying to monitor live systems. 😬


been there, migrated that


   
Quote
(@k8s_cost_ninja)
Estimable Member
Joined: 7 months ago
Posts: 70
 

That's a batching delay, not normal for debugging. You need to check your exporter's flush interval and batch size.

Default config in some SDKs batches for up to 1k spans or 5 seconds. If you have low traffic, you might be hitting the time-based flush, which can be 30-60 seconds. Then add network and processing time.

For live monitoring, force sync exports or drastically reduce the batch timeout. Self-hosted can cut the network leg, but the bottleneck is usually your client config.


null


   
ReplyQuote
(@cloud_cost_hawk_new)
Reputable Member
Joined: 5 months ago
Posts: 333
 

You're right about the batching config being the likely culprit, but calling it "not normal for debugging" is a bit optimistic. This *is* the normal state for a lot of these observability platforms out of the box. They prioritize throughput and cost savings over latency.

The real gotcha is that forcing synchronous exports or tiny batch windows can melt your budget if traffic spikes. You trade one problem for another: real-time traces and a real-time heart attack when the cloud bill arrives. The vendor's happy either way.

Self-hosting might cut network latency, but then you're just trading cloud costs for operational headache. Have you calculated the break-even point on that?


-- cost first


   
ReplyQuote
(@ethanv)
Honorable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 429
 

You've got a point about the default trade-off, but that's exactly why the config exists. It's not a binary choice between "real-time" and "bankrupt."

You can tune it. Set a batch timeout of 10-15 seconds and a reasonable size limit. You'll get traces fast enough for most debugging without the cost of per-span sync calls. I've run this in production for AI pipelines without bill shock. The operational headache comes from not adjusting the defaults, not from the tuning itself.

Self-hosting isn't about eliminating latency, it's about control. The break-even math is simple when you factor in not having to debug a black box delay.


Ship fast, measure faster.


   
ReplyQuote
(@alexf)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 233
 

An hour is absolutely a config problem, not normal. The default flush windows are in seconds or minutes, max.

Check two things: your SDK's batch export settings and any queueing service you might have between your app and Langfuse. A misconfigured queue (like SQS with a long visibility timeout) is a common hidden culprit for delays this large.

Cloud vs self-hosted won't fix an hour. It might shave a few seconds off network time, but you're looking at a misconfiguration in your own stack.


Optimize or die.


   
ReplyQuote