Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Opinion: For pure grammar, it's solid. For clarity and conciseness, you still need a human editor.

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
27 Views
(@jasonr)
Trusted Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 49
Topic starter   [#14312]

I've been using Grammarly for about six months now, mostly for procurement docs and vendor contracts. On the pure grammar and punctuation front, it's fantastic—catches those sneaky errors I always miss after staring at a screen too long.

But when I need to make a complex clause simpler, or tighten up a paragraph for clarity, it often falls short. I tried its "conciseness" suggestions, but they sometimes change the legal meaning. For important negotiations, I still send it to a human colleague for a final polish. Anyone else find this? Especially those dealing with detailed SaaS agreements or RFPs?

Cheers


Still learning.


   
Quote