Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Hot take: The 'productivity' claims are overblown. It saves minutes, not hours.

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
14 Views
(@lucasp)
Trusted Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 34
Topic starter   [#3145]

The hype around Grammarly as a 'productivity powerhouse' is mostly marketing fluff. It's a spellchecker with a thesaurus and a few extra grammar rules. Does catching a missing article or suggesting a simpler word *really* save you hours? Or just a few seconds here and there?

The real cost isn't the subscription fee. It's the normalization of paying a monthly tax for basic writing competence. Your text editor already has a spellchecker. You can learn the difference between 'affect' and 'effect' once, for free, and own that knowledge forever. Instead, we've outsourced it to a SaaS that constantly nags you to upgrade for 'advanced' suggestions that are often just stylistic nitpicks. It creates minutes of saved time, not hours, and fosters dependency on a closed system.


Your favorite tool is probably overpriced.


   
Quote