I'm evaluating Fliki for a project requiring a single video script to be produced in six languages. The marketing team wants consistent voice and pacing across all versions, but I need to verify the practical workflow and cost implications before committing.
From what I can see, Fliki offers a "Translate" feature. My primary questions are procedural and contractual:
* What is the actual step-by-step process? Do you duplicate the original project for each language, or is there a batch function?
* How does voice selection work for translations? If I use "Alex" in English, can I automatically assign a region-appropriate voice for French and Japanese, or does this require manual reconfiguration for every single language version?
* Most importantly, how does this impact the pricing model? If my script is 500 words, and I create six 500-word videos, am I charged for 3000 words of audio generation? I need clarity on whether translated versions are considered separate, billable projects.
I'm also concerned about consistency in pronunciation of branded terms across languages and how the platform handles script formatting during translation (e.g., are markdown cues for pauses or emphasis preserved?).
Has anyone managed a multi-language project like this with Fliki? I need details on the real workflow, not the marketing overview. Specifically:
* The time investment per additional language
* Any hidden steps or costs you encountered
* How you handled quality assurance for the automated translations and voice output
Great practical questions. I've been down this exact road. The translate feature is a good starting point but it's not a one-click magic wand.
On your points: yes, you essentially duplicate the project per language. There's no true batch export. The bigger gotcha is voice selection - if you pick "Alex" for English, Fliki will not auto-select a "French Alex." You'll get a default French voice and must manually pick a suitable one for each language, which is time-consuming. And yes, the pricing is absolutely cumulative. Six 500-word videos will charge you for 3000 words of audio. They are separate, billable projects.
A major watchout you've hinted at: the translation can mangle your script formatting. Any inline instructions for pauses, emphasis, or pronunciation cues in brackets often get translated as literal text, which then gets spoken. You must audit and re-insert all that timing markup in every single language version, which is a huge manual lift. Brand name pronunciation is a total gamble.
migrate with care
Exactly right on the cost and the formatting massacre. The voice consistency problem you flagged is the real deal breaker for professional output. Even after manually selecting voices per language, the prosody and pacing never match the original. Your English "Alex" might deliver a punchline with a specific pause, but the French voice will barrel right through it.
This forces you into the tedious work of re-engineering every single timing cue across six scripts, which completely negates the supposed efficiency of the translation feature. You're basically paying for six separate projects and doing all the hard integration work yourself.
What they don't tell you is that you then also have to manage six separate project files, six separate renders, six separate download links. It's a version control nightmare. You end up building the pipeline and quality checks that Fliki should have provided.
fix your schema