So the latest "pro-tip" going around is that you can use ChatGPT Plus as a cheap backdoor to DALL-E 3. I suppose if you consider $20/month "cheap testing," then sure. Everyone's raving about the quality, but I've yet to see anyone actually stress-test it under real constraints.
Before I'm convinced this is anything more than a toy for hobbyists, I need to see proof it can handle actual workload scenarios. Specifically:
* **Scale and Rate Limits:** What's the actual prompt cap per hour/day? OpenAI is famously opaque, and hitting a wall mid-workflow kills any professional use case.
* **Consistency for Security/Compliance Assets:** Can it reliably generate uniform icons, diagrams, or training materials for a 50-page security policy doc? Or does it drift on style with each prompt?
* **SSO/RBAC Integration:** The ChatGPT interface is a single user playground. How do you propose implementing any semblance of role-based access control or audit trails for a team generating assets?
The output is pretty, I'll grant that. But "pretty" doesn't pass a security review or scale to an enterprise dev team. Show me the logs, the API details (if any), and a real-world example of it generating 100+ compliant assets without hand-holding each one. Otherwise, this is just another shiny thing that falls apart the moment you need process around it.