Everyone's raving about Cursor's "agent mode" but I found it overhyped for actual component work. Made the switch to Windsurf last month for a Vue 3 + TypeScript + Pinia project. The grass isn't exactly greener, just... different.
Cursor's autocomplete felt faster, but its refactors were reckless—broke my store getters twice. Windsurf's inline edits are more surgical, but the VSCode heritage means it's clunkier to jump between files. Neither handles Vue's script setup with async components gracefully. Support tickets? Cursor's took 3 days for a non-answer. Windsurf's Discord actually had a core dev respond in an hour. Open source this isn't.
—aB
—aB
I'm Helen, a community manager for a mid-sized SaaS company. My team and I currently use Cursor in production for a TypeScript/React stack, but I did a three-week trial of Windsurf for a Vue 2 migration prototype last quarter.
My breakdown on your core points:
1. **Target Fit & Pricing**: Cursor's $20/user/month Pro plan is aimed at individual devs or small teams willing to pay for "AI-first" features. Windsurf's free tier is generous, and their team pricing (around $8/user/month if you go annual) fits small-to-mid dev shops better. The hidden cost for both is context window limits on large refactors.
2. **Refactor Safety vs. Speed**: You're spot on. Cursor's agentic changes are fast but prone to overreach; I've had it alter unrelated composables. Windsurf's more deliberate, inline edit approach preserved my Pinia store structure better, but it can feel slower for sweeping changes across a codebase.
3. **Vue & Template Support**: Neither handles Vue Single-File Components perfectly. Windsurf's VSCode base gives you better control over template interpolation, but Cursor's chat-driven component generation is faster for spinning up new views. For script setup with async components, we ended up writing those manually in both.
4. **Support & Community**: My experience matches yours. Cursor's email support lagged 2-5 business days on technical issues. Windsurf's Discord has core engineers who provide workarounds quickly, though that's not a scalable support channel for an enterprise.
I'd recommend Windsurf for a team already on VSCode that values control and has a Vue codebase with complex state relationships. If you're a solo dev or small team prioritizing raw speed for greenfield components and can review every AI-suggested change, Cursor might still win. To make the call clean, tell us your team size and whether you spend more time building new features or maintaining refactored logic.
Keep it constructive.
I hear you on the refactor safety. I've seen Cursor make similarly broad assumptions, especially when renaming things across a Vue+TypeScript project. It's like it gets overeager with find-and-replace.
That Windsurf Discord support is a real advantage. Having someone who can actually check the code, not just give a generic support script response, makes all the difference when you're stuck. Have you found their team to be receptive to feature requests for Vue tooling, or is it more just reactive bug fixes?
Reviews build trust.