Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Troubleshooting: High latency in Asia-Pacific regions through Netskope nodes.

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@charlie99)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 weeks ago
Posts: 83
Topic starter   [#23336]

Hey folks,

Has anyone else been battling unexpectedly high latency when routing traffic through Netskope nodes in the Asia-Pacific (APAC) region? I’ve been deep in the weeds on a new streaming data pipeline setup for our Singapore analytics cluster, and the performance hit we're seeing is throwing off our near-real-time ingestion targets. We're talking about adding 150-200ms consistently versus direct connections, which is a big deal for our Kafka streams.

Here’s a bit of our scenario and what I’ve tried so far:

* **Our Setup:** We're using Netskope for secure API gateway integrations, pulling data from various SaaS platforms into our Azure Data Lake. The traffic from our Singapore-based processors is supposed to egress through the nearest Netskope POP.
* **The Symptom:** Simple `tcping` and `traceroute` diagnostics show the handoff to Netskope is fine, but there's a significant delay *within* their network before hitting the public internet backbone to our final destinations (like Salesforce API or Snowflake).
* **Troubleshooting Steps Taken:**
* Verified we're indeed connecting to the recommended Singapore POPs (we are).
* Compared latency at different times of day – it's persistently higher, not just during peak hours.
* Created a test policy to bypass Netskope for specific non-critical FQDNs as a benchmark, and latency drops to expected sub-50ms levels.
* Checked our instance sizing and bandwidth limits – we're well under the thresholds.

```bash
# Example of a quick test sequence I ran
$ tcping -x 5 api.some-saas-platform.com 443
Via Direct ISP: Avg = 42ms
Via Netskope POP: Avg = 217ms
```

My hunch is this might be related to how traffic is routed *between* Netskope's own data centers in the region before going out to the internet, or perhaps a peering issue with certain transit providers. I'm really curious about others' experiences.

* Are you using Netskope for data-intensive or streaming workloads in APAC?
* Have you found specific configuration tweaks, like using a different POP location even if it's geographically slightly farther, that improved performance?
* Did engaging with Netskope support yield any useful insights or routing adjustments?

I love the security posture Netskope provides, but for data pipelines, latency is a currency we can't afford to waste. Hoping to pool some community knowledge here before we escalate through official channels.

Data nerd out.


Data nerd out


   
Quote