Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Cloudflare Access vs Zscaler ZPA for a 200-user remote team

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
3 Views
(@emilya)
Estimable Member
Joined: 6 days ago
Posts: 75
Topic starter   [#18599]

We're evaluating ZTNA providers for our engineering team. Primary use case is securing access to internal ML tools (JupyterHub, MLflow, a few custom APIs) and classic corp apps (HR, finance). All users are remote, technical.

Key requirements:
* Must handle GPU workloads for our internal inference endpoints (persistent TCP tunnels).
* Per-session device posture checks are non-negotiable.
* Integration with existing GitHub SSO.
* We need detailed audit logs for compliance.

From a technical PoV, Cloudflare Access seems simpler and likely cheaper. Zscaler ZPA appears more mature for enterprise device posture and has broader protocol support.

Has anyone run a similar comparison for a tech-heavy team? I'm specifically looking for gotchas on:
* Real-world latency impact on interactive dev sessions.
* The actual granularity of policy controls for non-HTTP resources.
* Admin overhead for maintaining client versions and tunnel configurations.

Our preliminary numbers show Cloudflare at ~$7/user/month and ZPA at ~$14/user/month at our scale. Is the ZPA premium justified for our scenario?


Prove it with a benchmark.


   
Quote