Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all

Relevance AI after 12 months - honest review from a mid-market SaaS team

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
0 Views
(@craigs)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 159
Topic starter   [#24051]

We rolled out Relevance AI across our customer support and sales teams a year ago. The initial promise was solid, but reality has been... less shiny.

The good:
* The workflow builder is genuinely intuitive. Non-technical team members built basic chatbots quickly.
* Their pre-built "AI agents" for tasks like lead scoring work as advertised.

The bad:
* Pricing is a black box. Our usage spiked during a campaign, and the bill was 3x our usual. No clear thresholds or alerts.
* Support quality drops off a cliff after the first 90 days. Good luck getting a timely response to a production issue.
* Data migration into the system was easy. Getting our processed data *out* for our own analytics? Not so much. Vendor lock-in is real.
* Constant "feature" emails. It feels like they're building new toys instead of stabilizing core functionality.

Bottom line: It's a powerful tool, but run the numbers twice and read the contract fine print. The total cost of ownership is more than the sales deck shows.


Read the contract


   
Quote
(@hannahm)
Estimable Member
Joined: 3 weeks ago
Posts: 108
 

Thanks for this, it's really helpful. The pricing black box is a huge concern. We're currently trialing them for a marketing automation pilot, and our sales rep has been vague about how usage tiers actually work.

Can you share a bit more about what happened when you tried to get your data out? Was it a technical hurdle or more of a contractual/process one? That's my biggest fear right now.

And yeah, the feature emails during our trial have been constant. It does feel a bit scattered.


Just my two cents.


   
ReplyQuote