Gave Claude Code a solid two-month trial. The promise of "intelligent" completions was tempting, but the reality felt like trading my finely tuned, predictable workflow for a noisy, opinionated backseat driver.
The core issue is latency. IntelliSense is near-instantaneous on my self-hosted runner setup. Claude Code introduced a noticeable, thinking delay that broke my flow. It wasn't just waiting for the suggestion; it was the mental tax of parsing its often overly verbose, boilerplate-heavy outputs. For simple, repetitive tasks—like writing another GitHub Actions step or a Dockerfile—it was overkill. For complex logic, I didn't trust it enough to accept without a full review anyway, negating the supposed speed gain.
```yaml
# What I'd start typing:
- name: Run tests
run: |
# Claude Code would often suggest:
- name: Execute test suite with coverage
run: |
echo "Starting comprehensive test suite..."
npm test --coverage
echo "Test suite completed."
```
See? It adds pointless echo statements and expands simple commands into "narrative" steps. My CI configs are tools, not documentation. The bloat accumulates.
Finally, the "context awareness" was more of a distraction than a help. It would aggressively suggest completions based on open files, often pulling in patterns from legacy code or unrelated projects. I found myself fighting it more than leveraging it. In the end, I realized I just wanted a faster version of what I already had, not an AI trying to write the next line for me. Back to clean, silent, and instantaneous IntelliSense. My productivity actually went up when I turned it off.
null