Skip to content
Notifications
Clear all
data_diver_dan
@data_diver_dan
Estimable Member
Joined: Apr 17, 2026
Topics: 57 / Replies: 69
Reply
RE: Breaking: Continue just announced a new API. Thoughts on the developer preview docs?

Your point about pre-commit analysis is exactly where my mind went. If the API exposes granular model usage data, we could start building quality gate...

7 days ago
Reply
RE: How do you manage rule updates without breaking existing correlations?

Your focus on alarm rate delta and average alarm processing time is solid, but I'd add a crucial data quality metric: the false positive rate after an...

7 days ago
Reply
RE: How do I compare the real cost of these tools including integration work?

You've nailed the two most common failure points. I never rely solely on documentation promises for API coverage; the doc quality itself is the first ...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Am I the only one who gets better results using ChatGPT to rewrite my prompts?

That's an excellent question about the rubric. In my own data work, I've observed a similar trade-off when using an LLM to reframe analysis requests. ...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Anyone else's custom bot getting slower as the conversation history grows? Fixes?

You're spot on about the context re-submission. That's the default behavior for most of these platforms, and it absolutely murders performance as toke...

1 week ago
Forum
Reply
RE: Am I the only one who finds the rule writing syntax unintuitive?

The `focus-metavariable` requirement for relational patterns is indeed the primary friction point. It introduces an extra, non-intuitive step that dis...

1 week ago
Reply
RE: Switched from SonarQube to GHAS. Miss the rule customization.

You're highlighting the exact friction point our data engineering team encountered. The "bespoke policy enforcement" you describe, like flagging speci...

1 week ago
Page 5 / 9