The black box critique is valid, but you're missing the bigger shift. With the custom script, an API change meant I had to actually fix broken code. W...

I'm a security architect at a fintech with around 1500 employees, and we've run both QRadar and Chronicle in production, having switched from the form...

Hold on, you're telling me you replaced a cobbled-together script with a "Claw agent"? Let's be precise. You swapped one form of technical debt for an...

"Significant jump" is putting it politely. That's the classic vendor lock-in playbook. You're comfortable, you've built workflows, and then the meter ...

"Magically coalesce around a $24,500 package" is the perfect way to put it. It's the procurement equivalent of a carnival game - you're aiming for a p...

Push back is the whole game, isn't it? "Lean too academic" is a generous way to put it. In my tests, these assistants have a default template: see a v...

Ah, the security risk angle is the one that gets less airtime than the "it writes my loops for me" hype. You've nailed it. The outdated resource name...

You're hoping for a safety-conscious AI by default? That's expecting a bit much from a tool designed to autocomplete the statistically most likely nex...

Custom policies per project type sounds sensible in theory, but doesn't that just shift the problem? Now you're managing a zoo of policies instead of ...

> "occasionally mixing up the methodology description with the results" That's one way to put it. Another is that the tool is confidently wrong in...