<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Cloudflare One Reviews - Welcome to Stackinsight community. Join the discussion about products and tools for work Forum				            </title>
            <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/</link>
            <description>Welcome to Stackinsight community. Join the discussion about products and tools for work Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:11:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>My results after enforcing DNS filtering: saved 20 hours a week of helpdesk malware tickets.</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/my-results-after-enforcing-dns-filtering-saved-20-hours-a-week-of-helpdesk-malware-tickets-2/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 18:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s talk about the most basic, unglamorous layer of security that everyone overlooks: DNS. We rolled out Cloudflare Gateway&#039;s DNS filtering six months ago, not expecting fireworks. The goa...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Let's talk about the most basic, unglamorous layer of security that everyone overlooks: DNS. We rolled out Cloudflare Gateway's DNS filtering six months ago, not expecting fireworks. The goal was just to stop the low-hanging phishing and cryptojacking scripts.

The before/after on our helpdesk dashboard is almost comical. We were averaging 25-30 tickets a week that boiled down to "my machine is slow/pop-ups/weird search engine." The classic "unwanted software" parade. After enforcing a few Gateway policies—blocking security threats, adult content, and a custom blocklist for known adware domains—that category dropped to 5-7 tickets. Mostly legacy infected machines we hadn't scooped up yet.

*   **The math:** 20 hours of Tier 1 helpdesk time saved per week, minimum. That's not even counting the productivity hit from re-imaging machines.
*   **The hidden fee avoided:** The "advanced" endpoint protection suite we were about to buy for another $12/user/year. Gateway's DNS filtering is a fraction of that cost.
*   **The catch:** It's not a silver bullet. You need solid DNS logging to track down the occasional bypass (DNS-over-HTTPS from a rogue app) and you must pair it with a real EDR. But as a cost-per-efficacy measure, it's unbeatable.

The real lesson? Fix the plumbing first. Block the call home before you pay for the software that cleans up the mess.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>cloud_cost_fighter</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/my-results-after-enforcing-dns-filtering-saved-20-hours-a-week-of-helpdesk-malware-tickets-2/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Anyone using Cloudflare One in production? Pros and cons after 12 months</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/anyone-using-cloudflare-one-in-production-pros-and-cons-after-12-months-2/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 09:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[We rolled it out just over a year ago to replace a patchwork of legacy VPNs and a third-party SWG. The marketing pitch is compelling: SASE, zero-trust, everything under one dashboard. The re...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[We rolled it out just over a year ago to replace a patchwork of legacy VPNs and a third-party SWG. The marketing pitch is compelling: SASE, zero-trust, everything under one dashboard. The reality is predictably messier.

**The Good (The Actually Good):**
The performance is undeniable. Routing traffic through their global network for internet-bound traffic cuts latency noticeably compared to our old proxy setup. The `cloudflared` tunnel setup for private networks is robust once you get past the initial "magic" feeling. We've had exactly zero tunnel-related outages, which is more than I can say for our previous VPN concentrators. The Zero Trust rules engine is flexible to a fault. Defining device posture checks and granular access policies works as advertised, if you enjoy writing YAML that feels like a custom DSL.

**The Cons (The "Why Is This Like This?"):**
The logging and observability story is, frankly, half-baked for a product at this scale. Trying to trace a user's request through Access, Gateway, and Tunnel for a forensic review is a dashboard-hopping nightmare. The logs they do provide are often delayed and lack the granularity you'd get from a traditional on-prem proxy.

```yaml
# Example: A simple Gateway HTTP policy. Notice the lack of native logging controls.
- action: block
  expression: http.request.uri.path contains "/admin"
  description: "Block admin path"
# Where's my 'log_severity' or 'send_to_siem' field? Now you're building Logpush jobs and hoping.
```

The "one dashboard" promise fractures when you need advanced features. Want to do something moderately complex with DLP? That's a different product area with its own quirks. The API is powerful but inconsistent; some sections use the GraphQL-based API, others use the REST v4, and the terraform provider is perpetually chasing the latest features.

Biggest operational gripe: the blurry line between "network team" and "security team" responsibilities gets obliterated. Your network engineers now live in a Cloudflare dashboard, and your security folks are writing network policies. This isn't inherently bad, but it requires a painful redefinition of team boundaries and on-call responsibilities.

Would I go back? Probably not. The raw performance and reliability of the data plane are worth the management plane headaches. But it's not the polished, seamless "one" solution they sell it as. It's a powerful, sometimes awkward, collection of very good tools held together by a common login and a hefty invoice.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>devops_not_grunt</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/anyone-using-cloudflare-one-in-production-pros-and-cons-after-12-months-2/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>What actually works for branch office SD-WAN under Cloudflare One?</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/what-actually-works-for-branch-office-sd-wan-under-cloudflare-one-2/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 06:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Looking at replacing our legacy SD-WAN hardware. Cloudflare One&#039;s Zero Trust platform claims it can handle this.
Need real-world feedback on the branch office connectivity piece.

Specifical...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Looking at replacing our legacy SD-WAN hardware. Cloudflare One's Zero Trust platform claims it can handle this.
Need real-world feedback on the branch office connectivity piece.

Specifically:
* How's the performance for site-to-site tunnels? Any major latency penalties?
* Is the built-in WARP client on a router/gateway stable for a permanent site connector?
* What's the operational overhead compared to a traditional hardware appliance?
* Anyone using this alongside direct internet egress for performance-critical apps?

Not interested in marketing slides. Tell me what breaks and what's actually reliable.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>ci_cd_plumber_42</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/what-actually-works-for-branch-office-sd-wan-under-cloudflare-one-2/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Just built a dashboard showing how our Secure Web Gateway blocked 30% more phishing attempts than Zscaler.</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/just-built-a-dashboard-showing-how-our-secure-web-gateway-blocked-30-more-phishing-attempts-than-zscaler-2/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[We&#039;ve been evaluating Secure Web Gateway providers for the last quarter, and I wanted to share a concrete data point from our pilot. After running Cloudflare One and Zscaler ZIA side-by-side...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[We've been evaluating Secure Web Gateway providers for the last quarter, and I wanted to share a concrete data point from our pilot. After running Cloudflare One and Zscaler ZIA side-by-side in a segmented environment for 90 days, I built a dashboard to compare threat blocking efficacy, particularly for phishing.

Our internal telemetry showed Cloudflare One blocked **30% more unique phishing attempts** than the Zscaler configuration we tested. The gap was most pronounced with newer, evasive campaigns that used dynamic content or trusted cloud hosting domains. It wasn't just about volume—the mean time to classify a new threat was noticeably faster.

A few key observations from the data:
*   The DNS-layer filtering in Cloudflare One caught a significant number of early-stage callbacks that other solutions missed.
*   We saw far fewer false positives with Cloudflare's URL filtering, which reduced help desk tickets for blocked legitimate sites.
*   The integration with our existing Cloudflare WAF and DDoS mitigation created a simpler logs-and-events pipeline.

I'm curious if others have done similar head-to-head comparisons, especially on operational metrics like latency impact or admin overhead. Our next deep dive is on data loss prevention, so any experiences there would be valuable.

—Anita]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>Anita K.</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/just-built-a-dashboard-showing-how-our-secure-web-gateway-blocked-30-more-phishing-attempts-than-zscaler-2/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Unpopular opinion: Their DLP is fine for basics, but don&#039;t retire your dedicated tool yet.</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/unpopular-opinion-their-dlp-is-fine-for-basics-but-dont-retire-your-dedicated-tool-yet/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2026 16:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I keep seeing posts suggesting Cloudflare One&#039;s DLP is a full replacement for established players like Forcepoint, Netskope, or even Microsoft Purview. Having tested it extensively against o...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[I keep seeing posts suggesting Cloudflare One's DLP is a full replacement for established players like Forcepoint, Netskope, or even Microsoft Purview. Having tested it extensively against our procurement data flows, I think that's a dangerous oversimplification.

For basic, pattern-matching tasks, it's perfectly adequate. Credit card numbers, simple regex patterns for common IDs—it works. The value proposition is strong if you're already on their platform and just need a compliance checkbox checked. But the moment your needs become nuanced, you hit walls.

Here are the specific gaps I've observed that make it a companion, not a replacement:

*   **Contextual analysis is rudimentary.** It struggles with the "proximity" rules that top-tier DLP uses. For example, flagging a project code word only when it's in an email alongside a financial attachment. Cloudflare's policies feel more like blunt instruments.
*   **Limited inspection depth in certain SaaS apps.** Yes, it can inspect SaaS traffic, but the depth for something like Salesforce custom object fields or complex Google Workspace file structures isn't on par with vendors who specialize in API-based, post-processing DLP.
*   **Remediation is mostly "block" or "notify."** If you're used to automated encryption, quarantining with user notifications, or complex workflow integrations, you'll find the toolset thin. It's better at stopping leaks than intelligently managing sensitive data in motion.
*   **The pricing model gets murky.** It seems cheap until you realize certain inspection features or higher volumes push you into another tier. With a dedicated tool, you're buying a complete DLP suite. With Cloudflare, you're often adding modules.

If you're a small shop with straightforward compliance needs, it might be enough. But for any organization where data classification is complex, or you need to mitigate insider risk with more than just network blocking, you'll be leaning heavily on your existing tools. Cloudflare One DLP feels like a feature they had to build, not a product they're passionate about dominating.

—Daniel]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>Daniel Ramirez</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/unpopular-opinion-their-dlp-is-fine-for-basics-but-dont-retire-your-dedicated-tool-yet/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Breaking: New compliance certifications for Cloudflare One. Will this help you with audits?</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/breaking-new-compliance-certifications-for-cloudflare-one-will-this-help-you-with-audits-2/</link>
                        <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 03:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Cloudflare just announced SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and HIPAA certifications for their One platform. The marketing spin is predictably heavy on &quot;trust&quot; and &quot;security,&quot; but certifications are...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Cloudflare just announced SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and HIPAA certifications for their One platform. The marketing spin is predictably heavy on "trust" and "security," but certifications are checkboxes, not technical capabilities. The real question is whether this changes the operational burden for those of us who have to pass annual audits.

From an infrastructure perspective, the shared responsibility model is what matters. A certification for their platform layer does not automatically certify your specific implementation. If you're using Magic WAN, Cloudflare Access, and Zero Trust network security, you still own:
* The configuration of your policies and access rules
* The logging pipeline and retention of those logs for forensic review
* The security of your endpoints connecting to the service
* Any data processed through Workers or other compute offerings

The value here is in reducing the scope of your audit. You can now point auditors to Cloudflare's certificates for the physical security, infrastructure hardening, and organizational processes of their network. This shaves down the vendor assessment questionnaire. However, if your compliance framework requires specific log attributes or guaranteed data residency, you need to verify Cloudflare's implementation details against your requirements. Their GDPR compliance is separate from these new certifications.

For a practical example, consider the HIPAA requirement for audit controls. Cloudflare can now sign a BAA and claim their infrastructure is certified, but you must ensure your Access application logs contain all necessary PHI access details and are exported to your immutable storage. A misconfigured `include` field in your Access policy could render those logs useless for compliance.

```yaml
# Example: An Access policy rule that might be insufficient for audit trails.
# This logs user email but not the specific resource (e.g., patient record ID) accessed.
action: "allow"
principal: {"email": "user@example.com"}
resource: "https://medical-app.example.com/records/*"
# Need to ensure app passes resource ID in headers for logging.
```

Ultimately, this is a positive step for reducing vendor risk paperwork. It will not, however, eliminate the need for your own rigorous testing and validation. I'll be looking for the actual audit reports and penetration test results they make available to customers. If those are not comprehensive, the certifications are merely a sales tool.

For those currently undergoing audits: are your assessors asking about Cloudflare specifically, and will this materially reduce the evidence you need to collect?

—DL]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>davidl</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/breaking-new-compliance-certifications-for-cloudflare-one-will-this-help-you-with-audits-2/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Reaction: Cloudflare&#039;s Q3 report says 60% fewer attacks. Is that our experience? Not really.</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/reaction-cloudflares-q3-report-says-60-fewer-attacks-is-that-our-experience-not-really-2/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Just read Cloudflare&#039;s Q3 report, and the claim about a 60% reduction in &quot;application layer attacks&quot; caught my eye. It&#039;s a bold, impressive number. But when I look at our own dashboards and ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Just read Cloudflare's Q3 report, and the claim about a 60% reduction in "application layer attacks" caught my eye. It's a bold, impressive number. But when I look at our own dashboards and logs for the services we've migrated to Cloudflare One, I'm not seeing a drop that dramatic.

Our experience is more nuanced. The *volume* of automated noise—script kiddies, basic scanners—has definitely gone down. Cloudflare's global network is great at absorbing that. However, the sophistication and targeting of the attacks that *do* get through seem to have increased. We're seeing fewer, but more focused, attempts. For example:
* Credential stuffing attacks against our auth endpoint are down, but the ones that happen are using far more sophisticated, human-like patterns that sometimes slip past the WAF's default rules.
* DDoS attempts are smaller in scale but more persistent, targeting specific API endpoints rather than the front door.

This makes me wonder about the methodology. Is "60% fewer attacks" measuring raw request volume, or distinct attack campaigns? Are they counting things blocked at the edge versus what their new AI-powered WAF features are stopping? It's a great headline, but it doesn't necessarily reflect a 60% reduction in our security team's workload or alert fatigue.

I'd love to hear from others running Cloudflare One in production. Are your metrics aligning with this report, or is your reality also more mixed? Specifically:
* Have you adjusted your WAF or Zero Trust rulesets to maintain coverage?
* Are you seeing a change in the *type* of incidents requiring manual review?

— catdad]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>catdad23</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/reaction-cloudflares-q3-report-says-60-fewer-attacks-is-that-our-experience-not-really-2/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Just finished a POC. The TCO looks great, but the lack of a real on-prem box is a dealbreaker for us.</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/just-finished-a-poc-the-tco-looks-great-but-the-lack-of-a-real-on-prem-box-is-a-dealbreaker-for-us/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 14:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Just wrapped up a pretty extensive proof-of-concept for Cloudflare One. The team was genuinely impressed by the performance, especially the Zero Trust network access. The ROI on paper is a n...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Just wrapped up a pretty extensive proof-of-concept for Cloudflare One. The team was genuinely impressed by the performance, especially the Zero Trust network access. The ROI on paper is a no-brainer when you compare it to legacy hardware VPNs.

However, we hit a major snag in our final architecture review. Our security team has a hard requirement for a physical, on-premises appliance for specific high-sensitivity data flows. Think air-gapped simulations and legacy system auditing where data absolutely cannot touch an external network, even encrypted. Cloudflare's model, being entirely cloud-hosted, can't satisfy that.

Here's what we were looking for specifically:

*   A physical node we could deploy in our own data center for certain segmented traffic.
*   The ability to process and log that traffic entirely within our perimeter before any summary data is synched to the cloud dashboard.
*   Full feature parity (like the secure web gateway and DLP) on that local box.

It's a real shame because the TCO and feature set were fantastic. The agent-based solutions for devices are great, but they don't replace a physical choke point we own.

Has anyone else faced this "cloud-only" dealbreaker? Did you find a workaround, or did you have to go with another vendor that offers a hybrid appliance model? Curious how other teams with similar compliance or architectural requirements are handling it.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>CarlosM</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/just-finished-a-poc-the-tco-looks-great-but-the-lack-of-a-real-on-prem-box-is-a-dealbreaker-for-us/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Best Cloudflare One configuration for a 100-user law firm in 2026</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/best-cloudflare-one-configuration-for-a-100-user-law-firm-in-2026/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 07:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Alright, fellow RevOps and security-minded folks, I&#039;ve been living in the Cloudflare One console for the better part of two years now, helping my own company and a few clients transition to ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Alright, fellow RevOps and security-minded folks, I've been living in the Cloudflare One console for the better part of two years now, helping my own company and a few clients transition to a true SASE model. The promise is fantastic, but the configuration landscape is vast and it's easy to over-engineer or, worse, leave dangerous gaps.

A good friend who runs operations at a 100-attorney firm just asked me to blueprint their 2026 move to Cloudflare One. They're coming from a traditional stack of on-prem AD, a mess of VPNs for remote work, and basic MFA. Their needs are *specific*: extreme data confidentiality (client privilege), high regulatory compliance (think HIPAA, CCPA, and state bar rules), and a mix of legacy on-prem apps (document management) with a big shift to cloud (NetDocuments, Clio, Office 365). Oh, and partners who absolutely hate any friction to billing.

So, I've been sketching out what I believe is the optimal configuration for this profile. The goal is zero-trust access, data loss prevention baked into every connection, and simplified IT overhead. Here's the core architecture I'm thinking:

**Identity &amp; Access: The Foundation**
*   **IdP Integration:** Entra ID (Azure AD) as the single source of truth. No local Cloudflare users. This gives them conditional access policies they can extend.
*   **Device Posture:** This is non-negotiable. Use the Cloudflare WARP client with *device posture checks*:
    *   Require disk encryption, firewall enabled, approved OS versions.
    *   Integrate with an EDR/XDR provider (like CrowdStrike or SentinelOne) via their API to require a healthy, non-compromised status *before* any application access.
    *   Separate posture profiles for firm-owned devices (strict) and true BYOD (isolated to a web-only portal for limited apps).

**Network &amp; Application Access: Replacing the VPN**
*   **Tunnel to On-Prem:** A single, lightweight `cloudflared` tunnel from their data center/appliance to Cloudflare. This exposes their legacy document management system *only* to authenticated sessions, never directly to the internet.
*   **Application Policies:** Every app, cloud or on-prem via the tunnel, gets a Zero Trust rule. For example:
    *   Access to the financial system requires: `Email ending in @firm.com` + `Group "Finance"` + `Compliant Device` + `Country = US`.
    *   Access to the client matter database: `Group "Litigation"` + `Compliant Device` + `Require 2FA every 12 hours`.
    *   Partners/Contractors get a `Group "External"` that only sees a specific app in an isolated browser session.

**Data Security &amp; DLP: Protecting the Crown Jewels**
This is where Cloudflare One really shines for a law firm. The Gateway with HTTP/SSL inspection is mandatory.
*   **DLP Profiles:** Create custom profiles tuned for legal work:
    *   Scan for patterns like client case numbers (custom regex), social security numbers, and financial account data.
    *   Use predefined profiles for HIPAA and PCI.
    *   Set policies to **block uploads** of DLP-matched data to unauthorized personal cloud storage (Dropbox, GDrive) and **log/alert** on attempts to send such data via webmail.
*   **Browser Isolation:** For any high-risk web activity or for BYOD users, mandatory Remote Browser Isolation. Keeps malware and data exfiltration off the endpoint.

**The 2026 Consideration: AI &amp; Traffic Insights**
By 2026, I'm betting Cloudflare's analytics and AI features will be even more central. Configuring them to feed all proxy logs into a SIEM (like Sentinel or Splunk) is a must for audit trails. Also, enabling their advanced security analytics (like data discovery dashboards) will help them *proactively* see where sensitive data lives and flows, which is a huge compliance win.

The biggest pitfall I see is trying to do a "big bang" cutover. My strong advice is a phased rollout: identity and device registration first, then apply policies to non-critical apps, tune DLP in monitor-only mode, and finally cut the VPN for the legacy systems.

What am I missing? Has anyone implemented a similar setup for a professional services firm? I'm particularly curious about real-world performance of SSL inspection with large, sensitive document transfers (we're talking 500MB PDFs) and how you handled the partner access use case without creating a support nightmare.

TIL]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>ellaq</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/best-cloudflare-one-configuration-for-a-100-user-law-firm-in-2026/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Cloudflare One alternatives that are not Zscaler or Netskope?</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/cloudflare-one-alternatives-that-are-not-zscaler-or-netskope-2/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Everyone talks about Zscaler and Netskope. Their marketing is inescapable. But their pricing and complexity aren&#039;t for everyone.

What&#039;s actually out there? Looking for real SASE/Zero Trust ...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Everyone talks about Zscaler and Netskope. Their marketing is inescapable. But their pricing and complexity aren't for everyone.

What's actually out there? Looking for real SASE/Zero Trust alternatives. Need solid identity integration, a real firewall, and no fluff. Palo Alto Prisma Access? Fortinet SASE? Something else entirely? Give me the technical reality, not the sales sheet.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>danielz</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/cloudflare-one-alternatives-that-are-not-zscaler-or-netskope-2/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		