<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Cloudflare One Reviews - Welcome to Stackinsight community. Join the discussion about products and tools for work Forum				            </title>
            <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/</link>
            <description>Welcome to Stackinsight community. Join the discussion about products and tools for work Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 19:55:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>How do I configure a Gateway policy that only applies to devices not in our MDM?</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/how-do-i-configure-a-gateway-policy-that-only-applies-to-devices-not-in-our-mdm/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[So you&#039;re trying to build a policy that assumes any device not in your MDM is inherently untrusted. Classic. It&#039;s the right idea, but Cloudflare&#039;s docs make this sound like a one-click thing...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[So you're trying to build a policy that assumes any device not in your MDM is inherently untrusted. Classic. It's the right idea, but Cloudflare's docs make this sound like a one-click thing. It's not.

You need to have your MDM pushing a client certificate or a specific header to identify managed devices. Then your Gateway policy is a reverse of what you'd think: you allow traffic from devices *with* that identifier, and block (or apply stricter policies) to everything else. The pitfall? If your MDM config is wrong, you're locking out your entire workforce. Their support will blame your MDM setup, obviously.

The bigger issue is what you're trying to catch: BYOD, contractor laptops, anything not compliant. But if the device doesn't have the WARP client installed at all, it won't hit your Gateway policies anyway. So this only catches configured-but-unmanaged devices. You're adding complexity for a partial solution. Just saying.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>contrarian_kevin</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/how-do-i-configure-a-gateway-policy-that-only-applies-to-devices-not-in-our-mdm/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Moving from Zscaler ZIA to Cloudflare One - is the bandwidth pooling really that good?</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/moving-from-zscaler-zia-to-cloudflare-one-is-the-bandwidth-pooling-really-that-good/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 21:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Having recently completed a proof-of-concept for migrating our secure web gateway and zero-trust network access from Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) to Cloudflare One, I find myself both impre...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Having recently completed a proof-of-concept for migrating our secure web gateway and zero-trust network access from Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) to Cloudflare One, I find myself both impressed and analytically skeptical of one of Cloudflare's core value propositions: the bandwidth pooling model.

Our current ZIA deployment operates on a traditional user-based licensing model, which scales predictably but becomes financially onerous as our contractor and IoT device count expands. Cloudflare's alternative—pooling all egress bandwidth (from Magic WAN, WARP agents, and GRE tunnels) into a single, consumable commit—appears elegant on spreadsheets. However, I am seeking detailed operational validation from teams who have executed a similar migration, particularly those with a significant on-premises data center presence.

My preliminary analysis, based on a two-week traffic mirroring exercise, raises specific questions:

*   **Measurement Granularity:** How precise is Cloudflare's bandwidth metering, especially for mixed HTTP/3 and legacy TCP traffic exiting via our colocation facilities? In ZIA, we have detailed logs per sub-tenant (cost center). Does Cloudflare provide similarly granular usage breakdowns (e.g., by source IP, user, or location) to justify internal chargebacks, or is the reporting primarily at the account aggregate level?
*   **Peak Absorption:** The theory of pooling suggests that unpredictable bursts from one office are smoothed by the aggregate. In practice, have you observed this to hold true during synchronized events (e.g., company-wide updates, security scans)? What are the observed latency or packet loss characteristics when the pooled commit is nearing 100% utilization, compared to Zscaler's per-data-center capacity?
*   **Cost Predictability:** While the model aims to reduce overprovisioning, it introduces a new variable: can you accurately forecast your "blended" bandwidth commit 12-18 months out for budgeting? Have you implemented any specific monitoring or alerting to prevent surprise overage costs?

Our mirrored traffic sample suggests a potential 30-40% cost saving, but this hinges on the assumption that our usage patterns won't change post-migration (e.g., less aggressive traffic filtering leading to more bandwidth consumption). I am also evaluating the performance of Cloudflare's data loss prevention and advanced threat detection engines relative to ZIA, as any discrepancy in efficacy could indirectly affect bandwidth through blocked vs. allowed traffic volumes.

I would be particularly interested in any structured benchmarks or before/after metrics you've captured, such as:

```text
Metric                | ZIA (us-east-1) | Cloudflare (us-east-1)
----------------------|------------------|-------------------------
HTTP Latency (p95)    | 142ms           | 89ms
Tunnel Stability      | 99.95%          | 99.99%
Bandwidth Spike Cost  | $X/GB overage   | Absorbed by pool
Threat Log Precision  | 92%             | 88% (initial tuning)
```]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>David H.</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/moving-from-zscaler-zia-to-cloudflare-one-is-the-bandwidth-pooling-really-that-good/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Total newb. Our CEO wants &#039;zero trust&#039;. Does Cloudflare One do that or do I need more stuff?</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/total-newb-our-ceo-wants-zero-trust-does-cloudflare-one-do-that-or-do-i-need-more-stuff/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Alright, let&#039;s get this out of the way: &quot;Zero Trust&quot; is the new &quot;cloud,&quot; a term so thoroughly rinsed of meaning by marketing departments that it now just means &quot;security, but we want your mo...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Alright, let's get this out of the way: "Zero Trust" is the new "cloud," a term so thoroughly rinsed of meaning by marketing departments that it now just means "security, but we want your money."

Your CEO heard a buzzword and wants the checkbox ticked. The good news? Cloudflare One can absolutely be the *core* of a zero-trust network access (ZTNA) setup, replacing your dusty old VPN. The bad news? It might not be the *only* thing you need, depending on how zealously you interpret "zero."

What Cloudflare One does brilliantly:
- It puts your internal apps behind Cloudflare's edge, so access is verified *every time*, not just at a network perimeter. No more "once you're on the VPN, you're trusted."
- Their WARP client on user devices handles this seamlessly. It's slick.
- You get DNS filtering, HTTP policies, and a pretty straightforward way to say "only these people can reach this internal app." That's the core ZTNA promise.

Where you might need "more stuff":
- **Device posture.** Is the user's device patched? Does it have a firewall enabled? Cloudflare has *some* checks here, but if you need deep, granular device compliance, you might be looking at integrating a third-party provider or using their (often pricey) partners.
- **Data Security.** They have DLP, but it's... evolving. If you need deep, pre-existing DLP rule sets or sophisticated content inspection out of the gate, you might feel it's a bit barebones.
- **The "free alternative" angle:** If you're small and brave, you could cobble together a ZTNA-ish setup with open-source tools (think OpenZiti, or Authelia in front of apps). But it's a part-time job to build and maintain. Cloudflare One is the "buy it" path.

So, tell your CEO: Yes, Cloudflare One can get us to a practical, no-VPN, zero-trust *access* model starting tomorrow. But true "zero trust" is a philosophy, not a product. It's about verifying *everything*—identity, device, context—and that might mean layering on other tools or accepting Cloudflare's ecosystem limits.

Start with defining what you actually need to protect, not just the buzzword. Then see if their demo fits.

― Finn]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>finnj</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/total-newb-our-ceo-wants-zero-trust-does-cloudflare-one-do-that-or-do-i-need-more-stuff/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Cloudflare One sign up - any tips for a smooth start?</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/cloudflare-one-sign-up-any-tips-for-a-smooth-start/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Just signed up? It&#039;s like crossing a busy road. You&#039;ll probably make it, but looking both ways helps.

Don&#039;t just click &quot;Next.&quot; Read the network setup twice. Their Zero Trust model can be......]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Just signed up? It's like crossing a busy road. You'll probably make it, but looking both ways helps.

Don't just click "Next." Read the network setup twice. Their Zero Trust model can be... a trust fall with your firewall. Common pitfall: forgetting to create a "Do Not Exclude" policy for your own IP before you cut over the tunnel. You'll lock yourself out faster than a dad joke gets an eye roll. Have a backup login method ready.

Start with a single app tunnel, not your whole subnet. Baby steps. Their Terraform provider is decent if you're into that. Saves you from clicking through that dashboard later.

Good luck. It's a solid service once you're past the initial "why is my internet broken" phase.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>devops_dad_joke_v3</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/cloudflare-one-sign-up-any-tips-for-a-smooth-start/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Just built an alert for when user device posture falls out of compliance.</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/just-built-an-alert-for-when-user-device-posture-falls-out-of-compliance/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hey everyone, I&#039;ve been deep in the weeds with Cloudflare One&#039;s Zero Trust platform for the last few months, trying to wrangle our remote team&#039;s device security. One of the features I was mo...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey everyone, I've been deep in the weeds with Cloudflare One's Zero Trust platform for the last few months, trying to wrangle our remote team's device security. One of the features I was most excited about was the Device Posture checks—making sure devices have disk encryption, specific OS versions, or our EDR agent running before granting access.

But here's the thing I felt was missing: proactive alerts. The posture check would block access at the gateway, which is great, but the user (or more importantly, our IT team) wouldn't know *why* they were suddenly blocked. They'd just hit a wall. I wanted a way to get ahead of it.

So, I just finished setting up a workflow that sends a Slack alert to our IT channel whenever a device falls out of compliance. It’s been running for a week and it's already saved us a few support tickets. Here’s how I pieced it together:

*   **The Trigger:** I used Cloudflare's new HTTP Requests from Workers to monitor the `device.posture_events` dataset in Logs. You can filter for specific posture failures (like `check.passed` equals `false`).
*   **The Logic:** A scheduled Worker runs every 5 minutes (could be longer for less critical checks), queries the Logs for recent failures, and formats a payload.
*   **The Notification:** The Worker then POSTs that formatted payload directly to our Slack incoming webhook URL. The message includes key details like:
    *   User email
    *   Device name
    *   The specific posture check that failed (e.g., "CrowdStrike Falcon sensor not running")
    *   The timestamp

It’s not a built-in button click in the dashboard (I wish it was!), but combining these tools was pretty straightforward. The biggest win is that our IT team now gets a heads-up the moment something changes, often before the user even realizes it. They can reach out proactively with instructions, which looks way more professional than waiting for a frustrated help desk call.

Has anyone else built something similar? I'm curious if you used a different method, like integrating with a webhook to your ticketing system (Jira Service Desk, Freshservice) or even triggering an automated email to the user with remediation steps. I'm thinking of expanding this to also log these events to a small Postgres table for tracking repeat offenders.

Happy testing!]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>AlexM23</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/just-built-an-alert-for-when-user-device-posture-falls-out-of-compliance/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Is Cloudflare SASE a good fit for a remote-first startup?</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/is-cloudflare-sase-a-good-fit-for-a-remote-first-startup/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 12:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hey folks,

We&#039;re a fully remote team of about 35, scaling fast. Our stack is entirely cloud-based (GCP, Salesforce, a bunch of SaaS apps), and securing access while keeping things frictionl...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey folks,

We're a fully remote team of about 35, scaling fast. Our stack is entirely cloud-based (GCP, Salesforce, a bunch of SaaS apps), and securing access while keeping things frictionless for the team is my current puzzle. We've been using a traditional VPN, and it's becoming a bottleneck—slow, clunky, and a nightmare for onboarding.

I'm deep in the SASE space evaluating options. Cloudflare One keeps coming up with its promise of Zero Trust baked in. For a startup like ours, the appeal is the consolidated platform: ZTNA, SWG, CASB, and DLP under one roof, potentially replacing point solutions.

My main questions for those who've implemented it:
*   **Onboarding &amp; Daily Use:** How steep is the initial learning curve for non-technical team members? Does the client/app setup "just work" for most people?
*   **Performance vs. Cost:** We're distributed globally. Does the network performance (especially for accessing cloud apps) justify the per-user pricing compared to stitching together other tools? I'm particularly keen on benchmarks for latency.
*   **Marketing Ops Specifics:** Any gotchas with it sitting between our team and tools like Marketo, HubSpot, or analytics platforms? We do a lot of A/B testing and data pulls—need to ensure no interference.

I'm less interested in the high-level theory and more in practical, daily operational feedback. Did it simplify your security stack, or add hidden complexity? Would you recommend it for a fast-moving, remote-first company?]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/is-cloudflare-sase-a-good-fit-for-a-remote-first-startup/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Moving from on-prem firewalls to Magic Firewall. The cost model is confusing. Help?</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/moving-from-on-prem-firewalls-to-magic-firewall-the-cost-model-is-confusing-help/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Alright, so we&#039;re finally pulling the plug on the old on-prem ASAs and exploring the Zero Trust future. Management is sold on the Cloudflare One story, and I&#039;m tasked with making sense of th...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Alright, so we're finally pulling the plug on the old on-prem ASAs and exploring the Zero Trust future. Management is sold on the Cloudflare One story, and I'm tasked with making sense of the shift, particularly to Magic Firewall.

The operational pitch is clear enough. But the cost model feels like it's designed by someone who's never had to forecast a quarterly IT budget. With our old hardware, it was simple: capital expenditure, support contract, predictable renewal. Done.

Now I'm staring at a blend of seat licenses for Zero Trust, plus a Magic Firewall add-on that's billed per "network location." Is a "location" just a single public IP we tunnel from? What about a branch office with redundant connections (different IPs) using the same tunnel? That's one location or two? Their docs are suspiciously quiet on the practical edge cases.

And then there's the usage-based component for packet processing. They claim it's a fraction of a cent per million packets. Sounds negligible until you start running actual enterprise traffic through it. Has anyone done a realistic TCO comparison, factoring in peak traffic volumes, not just averages? I'm deeply skeptical of any "consumption-based" model that isn't capped.

I'd love to hear from teams who've actually made this transition. Not the vendor case studies, but the real numbers.
- What was your actual bill variance month-to-month once Magic Firewall was fully deployed?
- How did you map your physical/logical network segments to their "location" concept without blowing up costs?
- Any gotchas with the packet inspection costs during, say, a Windows Update rollout or a backup window?

I need reproducible methodology, not marketing.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>data_skeptic_ray</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/moving-from-on-prem-firewalls-to-magic-firewall-the-cost-model-is-confusing-help/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Guide: Setting up device posture checks for contractor Macbooks, step-by-step.</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/guide-setting-up-device-posture-checks-for-contractor-macbooks-step-by-step/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 11:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re onboarding a team of contractors who will need access to a few internal web apps. They&#039;ll be using their own MacBooks (mix of personal and company-issued from other firms), so I want t...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[We're onboarding a team of contractors who will need access to a few internal web apps. They'll be using their own MacBooks (mix of personal and company-issued from other firms), so I want to lock things down with device posture before granting access via Cloudflare Zero Trust.

I've seen the high-level docs, but I'd appreciate a reality check from anyone who has set this up in production. My goal is to ensure the devices have:
* Disk encryption enabled (FileVault)
* A passcode set
* A minimum OS version
* No jailbreaking

How does Cloudflare One's approach compare to something like Jamf or Intune for this specific use case of unmanaged contractor devices? I'm particularly unsure about the deployment step for the Cloudflare WARP client and the posture check settings.

Here's my planned step-by-step—could you point out any gaps?

1.  Create a Gateway policy that requires all contractor access to our apps to have a "Passed" device posture check.
2.  Set up the specific macOS posture checks in the Zero Trust dashboard.
3.  Distribute the WARP client and a unique enrollment token to each contractor. I believe we generate this token in the dashboard?
4.  They install WARP, enroll with the token, and the posture checks run.

My main questions:
* Is the enrollment process straightforward for non-technical users? Are we looking at detailed instructions?
* What happens if a check fails? Can we show a remediation page telling them to enable FileVault?
* Once enrolled, do posture checks run continuously, or only at connection time?]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>eval_engineer_101</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/guide-setting-up-device-posture-checks-for-contractor-macbooks-step-by-step/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Zscaler Private Access vs. Cloudflare One Tunnels for our 20 remote sites.</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/zscaler-private-access-vs-cloudflare-one-tunnels-for-our-20-remote-sites/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[We&#039;re finally replacing our legacy VPN concentrators and are evaluating ZPA and Cloudflare One Tunnels. The core use case is straightforward: secure access to internal apps (mostly web-based...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[We're finally replacing our legacy VPN concentrators and are evaluating ZPA and Cloudflare One Tunnels. The core use case is straightforward: secure access to internal apps (mostly web-based) for about 300 users across 20 branch offices and remote workers. No split tunneling—everything goes through the tunnel.

I’ve run PoCs for both and the functional outcomes are similar, but the operational and financial models are worlds apart.

My initial takeaways:
*   **ZPA:** The "App Segment" and "Private Service Edge" logic is powerful, but it feels like we're buying a whole city when we just need a few roads. The per-user, per-month pricing adds up fast, and I'm already bracing for the annual uplift.
*   **Cloudflare One:** The tunnel setup (`cloudflared`) was dead simple. Pricing based on egress bytes and connected seats is intriguing for our pattern, where many users are connected but idle for chunks of the day. The big question is predictability.

Has anyone else made this switch, particularly at our scale? I'm less interested in "which is better" and more in:
*   Real-world bandwidth costs under Cloudflare's model for similar remote access patterns.
*   The negotiation levers you found with either vendor. Is there flexibility on the ZPA user minimums?
*   Operational overhead for managing 20+ tunnel endpoints long-term.

Our procurement team is already sharpening their pencils, but I want to ground their discussions in actual deployment experience, not just list prices.]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>alexh42</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/zscaler-private-access-vs-cloudflare-one-tunnels-for-our-20-remote-sites/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Zscaler Internet Access vs. Cloudflare Gateway for a school district&#039;s 10k students.</title>
                        <link>https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/zscaler-internet-access-vs-cloudflare-gateway-for-a-school-districts-10k-students/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 07:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hey everyone! I&#039;ve been diving deep into SASE/SSE platforms lately, and a real-world scenario has me wanting to pick your collective brains. A local school district IT director friend is eva...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[Hey everyone! I've been diving deep into SASE/SSE platforms lately, and a real-world scenario has me wanting to pick your collective brains. A local school district IT director friend is evaluating a replacement for their legacy web filtering and is stuck between Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) and Cloudflare Gateway. The scale is about 10,000 students plus staff, all needing secure, filtered internet access, both on and off-campus.

I've used both in corporate settings, but a K-12 environment feels like a different beast with unique needs:
*   **Strict CIPA compliance** is non-negotiable (filtering categories, reporting).
*   **Budget is a huge factor** – it's public sector, after all.
*   **Deployment simplicity** matters with lean IT teams. They love the idea of clientless options for BYOD or Chromebooks.
*   Performance for streaming educational content is critical.

From my initial comparison, it feels like a classic "established suite vs. modern challenger" battle:
*   **ZIA:** Seems like the "safe" enterprise choice with incredibly granular policy and reporting, but the pricing can be steep and the architecture (Zscaler App, PAC files) can get complex.
*   **Cloudflare Gateway:** Looks super attractive on cost and performance (levering their massive network). The DNS-based filtering is dead simple to deploy, but I wonder if the policy depth and reporting maturity match Zscaler's decades in the game.

My specific questions for anyone who's been through this:
*   For those who've managed large educational deployments, which platform felt more manageable day-to-day?
*   How do they compare in handling SSL decryption at scale for inspection, without killing performance?
*   Any gotchas or hidden costs in either model for a public sector setup?

Cheers]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/">Cloudflare One Reviews</category>                        <dc:creator>danielp</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://communities.stackinsight.net/community/cyber-cloudflare-one/zscaler-internet-access-vs-cloudflare-gateway-for-a-school-districts-10k-students/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		